Superconducting gap in the presence of bilayer splitting in underdoped (formula presented)
Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, ISSN: 1550-235X, Vol: 66, Issue: 14, Page: 1-4
2002
- 56Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations56
- Citation Indexes56
- CrossRef56
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Article Description
The clearly resolved bilayer splitting in angle-resolved photoemission spectra of the underdoped Pb-Bi2212 compound raises the question of how the bonding and antibonding sheets of the Fermi surface are gapped in the superconducting state. Here we compare the superconducting gaps for both split components and show that within the experimental uncertainties they are identical. By tuning the relative intensity of the bonding and antibonding bands using different excitation conditions, we determine the precise k dependence of the leading edge gap. Significant deviations from the simple (formula presented) gap function for the studied doping level are detected. © 2002 The American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85038310525&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.66.140509; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.140509; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.140509/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.140509; http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.140509; http://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.140509
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know