(g-2) anomaly, Higgs bosons, and heavy neutrinos
Physical Review D, ISSN: 0556-2821, Vol: 67, Issue: 7
2003
- 9Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Within the model based on the SU(2)×SU(2) ×U(1) gauge group and having a bidoublet and two triplets of the Higgs fields (left-right model), the Higgs sector impact on the value of the muon anomalous magnetic moment (AMM) is considered. The contributions coming from the doubly charged Higgs bosons, the singly charged Higgs bosons, and the lightest neutral Higgs boson are taken into account. The obtained value of the muon AMM is a function of the Higgs boson masses and the Higgs boson coupling constants (CC's). We express the largest part of the CC's as a function of the heavy neutrino sector parameters. We show that at the particular parameter values the model under study could explain the BNL 2000 result. © 2003 The American Physical Society.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=13544265505&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.67.073023; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85039018596&origin=inward; https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.073023; http://harvest.aps.org/v2/journals/articles/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.073023/fulltext; http://link.aps.org/article/10.1103/PhysRevD.67.073023
American Physical Society (APS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know