Designing a collaborative middleware for semantic and user-aware service composition
Proceedings - 25th IEEE International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, WETICE 2016, Page: 223-228
2016
- 1Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The large number of available services, provided by different means such as the Web, smartphone apps, and wearable devices, provides users a valuable support for their everyday activities, but at the same time introduces the need for a tailored choice and exploitation of them. Several approaches have been proposed that take into account users' preferences, but a comprehensive user-aware approach is still missing. In a previous work we proposed an approach that addressed the user-aware composition of services, in this paper we propose to extend the previous approach by considering also semantic techniques and simple collaboration aspects. So, we propose the definition of a middleware for composing and exploiting services that exhibits some key features: (i) it considers the profile of the users that exploit the service to choose appropriate services for them, (ii) it exploits techniques of semantic similarity between user and service descriptions to make the choice more effective, and (iii) it enables the collaboration among users. By means of a case study we present a possible scenario that can take advantage of our middleware, and we show how it can be exploited.
Bibliographic Details
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know