Mohs micrographic surgery for nail unit tumours: an update and a critical review of the literature
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, ISSN: 1468-3083, Vol: 32, Issue: 10, Page: 1638-1644
2018
- 33Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- CrossRef33
- 30
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Review Description
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a good treatment option for epithelial neoplasms, especially when localized in areas where tissue conservation is crucial, such as the nail unit (NU). MMS is a method of radical excision offering high cure rates due to the margin control and functional preservation. Our aim is to provide a review on the use of MMS for the treatment of the most common nail tumours. We revised the current literature on the use of MMS to treat malignant neoplasms (Bowen's disease, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, keratoacanthoma, carcinoma cuniculatum) and benign neoplasms (onychomatricoma and glomus tumour). MMS represents a successful surgical option for nail tumours, firstly in terms of tissue conservation: the NU anatomy is complex and the preservation of the component structures is imperative for its functionality. Secondly, due to the surgical radicality, which is essential not only for the clearing of malignant tumours, but also for benign cases, in order to reduce recurrences. Although a conservative treatment of NU melanoma with MMS has been proposed, in our experience, the conservative approach with functional surgery is a good option for the treatment of non-invasive melanoma (in situ and Ia).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047668108&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15036; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29706031; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jdv.15036; http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jdv.15036; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jdv.15036
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know