Repowering of a rankine cycle power plant by means of concentrating solar collectors
Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Vol: 4, Page: 163-170
2011
- 9Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Repowering of an existing steam power plant by means of solar concentrating collectors is examined as a viable option to decrease CO2 emissions and increase electric power production during daytime peak load energy demanding hours. In the proposed scheme, the regenerative bleeds from the steam turbine are partially intercepted while boiler feed-water is heated by means of parabolic solar trough concentrating collectors. It is considered that fossil boiler, steam turbine and condenser are the same of the original plant, without modifications. After choosing a steam cycle reproducing an existing power plant, the scheme of solar repowering is examined and the efficiency of conversion of the solar energy is optimized in relation to the characteristics of the solar collector. The paper shows that the modified scheme produces very little effects on the working conditions of the existing components, either at full load or partial load, and does not reduce the conversion efficiency of the fossil fuel. In comparison with solar thermal power plants with heat storage and only solar energy as thermal input, the proposed scheme is expected to have comparable efficiency but lower costs per kWh produced, as a consequence of the fact that there is no need for steam turbine, condenser, cooling tower and auxiliary boiler. Moreover it is expected that personnel and maintenance costs will be lower. Copyright © 2011 by ASME.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84865455781&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2011-45736; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/GT/proceedings/GT2011/54648/163/352156; http://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/GT/proceedings-pdf/doi/10.1115/GT2011-45736/4529154/163_1.pdf; http://proceedings.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/proceeding.aspx?articleid=1632544; https://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2011-45736
ASME International
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know