Recent Geodynamics: from Crustal Movements to Monitoring Critical Objects
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, ISSN: 1069-3513, Vol: 55, Issue: 1, Page: 65-86
2019
- 15Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Abstract: This paper addresses the evolution of the views on the subject and methods of geodynamics over the past fifty years. The problems of the metrological provision of the results of repeated observations by the ground-based and satellite geodesy are discussed. It is shown that the basic characteristics of the recent geodynamical processes substantially depend on the degree of spatiotemporal detail of the observational systems. A variant of the solution is suggested for the problem of paradoxes of large and small strain rates which was detected during the studies at the geodynamical sites in seismically active and weakly seismic regions. For explaining the anomalous deformational activity of the platform’s faults, the mechanism of parametric excitation of the processes is suggested according to which the time fluctuations in the internal parameters of a fault zone (stiffness, pore pressure, coefficient of friction) under quasi-static external loading form local strain anomalies. The results of strain monitoring are demonstrated by the example of a shelf oil field. The assertion is substantiated that the concept of geodynamical testing sites is a universal form for investigating the recent deformational processes which offers a unified framework for determining the spatiotemporal structure of the geodynamical phenomena of different scales that are used in the fundamental and applied studies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064897790&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s106935131901004x; http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S106935131901004X; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1134/S106935131901004X.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S106935131901004X/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/s106935131901004x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S106935131901004X
Pleiades Publishing Ltd
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know