Traditional urinary cytology and tyrosinase RT-PCR in metastatic melanoma patients: Correlation with clinical status
Journal of Clinical Pathology, ISSN: 0021-9746, Vol: 61, Issue: 2, Page: 179-183
2008
- 5Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef5
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Background: The finding of a suspicious urinary cytology is not uncommon in melanoma patients, in as much as morphology alone is often unable to distinguish the variable cytological features of melanoma cells. To date, although tyrosinase reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assay has been used to identify melanoma cells in peripheral blood and tissues, this method has not been applied to the analysis of urine samples. Methods: RT-PCR mRNA tyrosinase expression was analysed in 79 urine samples from patients with metastatic melanoma and correlated with standard morphology/immunocytology. The results were compared with the disease course and presence of genito-urinary involvement. Results: A positive RT-PCR expression was found in 18/79 urine samples from patients with metastases; four of the 18 patients had positive cytology, nine had atypical cytology, and five had negative cytology. Genito-urinary metastases were demonstrated in 27.8% tyrosinase-positive patients but in only 9.8% of the negative patients. The majority of tyrosinase-positive patients had a progressive disease unresponsive to chemotherapy. Urine samples from 20 patients with non-melanoma cancer and 20 healthy subjects were all negative. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the higher sensitivity of RT-PCR compared with standard cytology in detection of urinary melanoma cells, and suggest that this assay could be used as an additional tool in the presence of negative or suspicious cytology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=38849156387&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2007.049577; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17675535; https://jcp.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/jcp.2007.049577; https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.2007.049577; https://jcp.bmj.com/content/61/2/179
BMJ
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know