Introduction to A Compromise Programming Based Method for Complex Scheduling and Planning Problems
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Page: 265-272
2021
- 3Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Planning and Planning (SP) plays a vital role in many fields. However, SP problems become more complex when they require to archive multi goals in decision-making processes that are more difficult to solve and push the decision-maker into a dilemma. This paper introduces an adaptive method based on the compromise programming approach to multi-objective optimization (MOP) in scheduling and planning (SP) problems. The proposed method gives an effective integration of mathematical programming with evolutionary algorithms (EA). Through the technique, decision-makers can validate the models as well as evaluate different decision alternatives. The method is in the development progress. However, we have obtained preliminary results by applying the method for solving some SP problems. These results show the feasibility of the proposed method.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know