Accounting Discretion and Purchase Price Allocation After Acquisitions

Citation data:

Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, ISSN: 0148-558X, Vol: 32, Issue: 2, Page: 241-270

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 2734
Full Text Views 1774
Abstract Views 938
Link-outs 18
Downloads 4
Captures 100
Exports-Saves 100
DOI:
10.1177/0148558x15598693
Author(s):
Ivy Xiying Zhang, Yong Zhang
Publisher(s):
SAGE Publications
Tags:
Business, Management and Accounting, Economics, Econometrics and Finance
article description
The recent movement in standards setting toward fair-value-based accounting beyond financial assets and liabilities calls for more empirical evidence on fair-value measurement, especially that of intangible assets. This article studies the initial valuation of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets after acquisitions. We find that the allocation of purchase price to goodwill and identifiable intangible assets is related to the economic determinants of the valuation. However, it is also significantly affected by managerial incentives arising from the differential treatments of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 142. The same managerial discretions are not exhibited in the purchase price allocation prior to SFAS 142, when goodwill and other intangibles are both amortized. These findings suggest that unverifiable fair value measures are associated with the underlying economics but also deviate from the true values in the presence of management reporting incentives. Further analysis suggests that external appraisers constrain managerial discretion in intangible asset valuation to an extent but do not completely eliminate it.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.