Hormonal responses to non-nutritive sweeteners in water and diet soda
Nutrition and Metabolism, ISSN: 1743-7075, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 71
2016
- 72Citations
- 173Usage
- 182Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations72
- Citation Indexes69
- 69
- CrossRef31
- Policy Citations3
- Policy Citation3
- Usage173
- Downloads141
- Abstract Views32
- Captures182
- Readers182
- 182
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- News2
Most Recent News
10 'Hormone Disruptors' That Are Causing You To Gain Weight
A dietitian reveals the troublemakers that can mess with your hormones and potentially lead to weight gain. In today's fast-paced world, weight gain is a
Article Description
Background: Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS), especially in form of diet soda, have been linked to metabolic derangements (e.g. obesity and diabetes) in epidemiologic studies. We aimed to test acute metabolic effects of NNS in isolation (water or seltzer) and in diet sodas. Methods: We conducted a four-period, cross-over study at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (Bethesda, Maryland). Thirty healthy adults consumed 355 mL water with 0 mg, 68 mg, 170 mg, and 250 mg sucralose, and 31 individuals consumed 355 mL caffeine-free Diet Rite Cola™, Diet Mountain Dew™ (18 mg sucralose, 18 mg acesulfame-potassium, 57 mg aspartame), and seltzer water with NNS (68 mg sucralose and 41 mg acesulfame-potassium, equivalent to Diet Rite Cola™) in randomized order, prior to oral glucose tolerance tests. Blood samples were collected serially for 130 min. Measures included GLP-1, GIP, glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glucose absorption, gastric emptying, and subjective hunger and satiety ratings. Results: Diet sodas augmented active GLP-1 (Diet Rite Cola™ vs. seltzer water, AUC, p = 0.039; Diet Mountain Dew™ vs. seltzer water, AUC, p = 0.07), but gastric emptying and satiety were unaffected. Insulin concentrations were nominally higher following all NNS conditions without altering glycemia. Sucralose alone (at any concentration) did not affect metabolic outcomes. Conclusions: Diet sodas but not NNS in water augmented GLP-1 responses to oral glucose. Whether the trends toward higher insulin concentrations after NNS are of clinical importance remains to be determined. Our findings emphasize the need to test metabolic effects of NNS after chronic consumption. Trial registration: The data for this manuscript were gathered from clinical trial # NCT01200940.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992046740&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0129-3; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01200940; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777606; http://nutritionandmetabolism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12986-016-0129-3; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/sphhs_exer_facpubs/82; https://hsrc.himmelfarb.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1083&context=sphhs_exer_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0129-3; https://nutritionandmetabolism.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12986-016-0129-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know