Sustainable waste management of bottom ash as cement replacement in green building
Engineering Challenges for Sustainable Future - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Civil, offshore and Environmental Engineering, ICCOEE 2016, Page: 517-520
2016
- 2Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Since global warming and green buildings have been the concern of the scientific society, efforts were made toward achieving more green and sustainable buildings. One of the efforts was to utilize waste materials such as Coal Bottom Ash (CBA) as cement replacement in the concrete mixture to reduce the harmful effects of cement manufacturing procedure and dumping of coal burning products from utilities industry. This paper studies the effect of replacing cement in concrete mixture by CBA. The porosity of four different concrete mixtures including control mixture was studied using different percentages of CBA, which are 0%, 10%, 20%, and 30% as cement replacement. The results have shown improvement in porosity at 10% and 20% replacement. However, 30% replacement was chosen as the optimum percentage since it showed a 6.825% percentage of porosity which is slightly similar to control mixture, therefore, it utilize larger amount of CBA while providing normal concrete quality, which contribute to the sustainable waste management target of Malaysia.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know