Comparing Single Case Design Overlap-Based Effect Size Metrics From Studies Examining Speech Generating Device Interventions.

Citation data:

American journal on intellectual and developmental disabilities, ISSN: 1944-7515, Vol: 121, Issue: 3, Page: 169-93

Publication Year:
2016
Usage 394
Abstract Views 217
Full Text Views 142
Link-outs 35
Captures 55
Exports-Saves 35
Readers 20
Citations 1
Citation Indexes 1
PMID:
27119210
DOI:
10.1352/1944-7558-121.3.169
Author(s):
Chen, Mo, Hyppa-Martin, Jolene K, Reichle, Joe E, Symons, Frank J
Publisher(s):
American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD)
Tags:
Medicine, Psychology, Arts and Humanities
article description
Meaningfully synthesizing single case experimental data from intervention studies comprised of individuals with low incidence conditions and generating effect size estimates remains challenging. Seven effect size metrics were compared for single case design (SCD) data focused on teaching speech generating device use to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) with moderate to profound levels of impairment. The effect size metrics included percent of data points exceeding the median (PEM), percent of nonoverlapping data (PND), improvement rate difference (IRD), percent of all nonoverlapping data (PAND), Phi, nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP), and Tau(novlap). Results showed that among the seven effect size metrics, PAND, Phi, IRD, and PND were more effective in quantifying intervention effects for the data sample (N = 285 phase or condition contrasts). Results are discussed with respect to issues concerning extracting and calculating effect sizes, visual analysis, and SCD intervention research in IDD.

This article has 0 Wikipedia reference.