Constrained phase retrieval: When alternating projection meets regularization
Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics, ISSN: 1520-8540, Vol: 35, Issue: 6, Page: 1271-1281
2018
- 28Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Simplicity and few finely tuned parameters are the main advantages of alternating projection (AP) methods, a fundamental class of phase retrieval (PR) methods in the optical imaging field. However, AP methods often suffer from low-quality imaging when few diffraction patterns are recorded. Regularized PR methods avoid this deficiency by using some proper regularization models, but many finely tuned parameters are needed. In this work, we propose a novel unified framework called constrained PR (ConPR), which brings the AP method and the regularization approach together. The proposed ConPR framework not only can recover high-quality images from few diffraction patterns, but also does not need fine-tuning of the parameters. Our proposed generalized constrained PR optimization model consists of a relation function term, a regularization term, and a measurement constraint. The measurement constraint ensures that the recovered image matches with the measurement, and the regularization term can impose some desirable properties on the recovered image. The relation function promotes the approximation of the two underlying variables. The sparsity under the block-matching and 3D filtering frame is incorporated into the proposed ConPR framework. The problem formulation consists of an image updating sub-problem and a constrained optimization sub-problem. The epigraph set of the data fidelity function is defined, and the constrained optimization sub-problem is solved via the epigraph concept. Diffraction imaging from one noisy coded diffraction pattern demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.
Bibliographic Details
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know