The Predictive Nature of Pseudoneglect for Visual Neglect: Evidence from Parietal Theta Burst Stimulation
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 8, Issue: 6, Page: e65851
2013
- 31Citations
- 55Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations31
- Citation Indexes31
- 31
- CrossRef14
- Captures55
- Readers55
- 55
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Article Description
Following parietal damage most patients with visual neglect bisect horizontal lines significantly away from the true centre. Neurologically intact individuals also misbisect lines; a phenomenon referred to as 'pseudoneglect'. In this study we examined the relationship between neglect and pseudoneglect by testing how patterns of pre-existing visuospatial asymmetry predict asymmetry caused by parietal interference. Twenty-four participants completed line bisection and Landmark tasks before receiving continuous theta burst stimulation to the left or right angular gyrus. Results showed that a pre-existing pattern of left pseudoneglect (i.e. right bias), but not right pseudoneglect, predicts left neglect-like behaviour during line bisection following right parietal cTBS. This correlation is consistent with the view that neglect and pseudoneglect arise via a common or linked neural mechanism. © 2013 Varnava et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0065851; 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g004
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84879148039&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23823975; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g002; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0065851#pone-0065851-t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0065851&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.t001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0065851; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g007; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0065851.g004
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know