Who has used internal company documents for biomedical and public health research and where did they find them?
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 5, Page: e94709
2014
- 9Citations
- 30Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef6
- Captures30
- Readers30
- 30
Article Description
Objective: To describe the sources of internal company documents used in public health and healthcare research. Methods: We searched PubMed and Embase for articles using internal company documents to address a research question about a health-related topic. Our primary interest was where authors obtained internal company documents for their research. We also extracted information on type of company, type of research question, type of internal documents, and funding source. Results: Our searches identified 9,305 citations of which 357 were eligible. Scanning of reference lists and consultation with colleagues identified 4 additional articles, resulting in 361 included articles. Most articles examined internal tobacco company documents (325/361; 90%). Articles using documents from pharmaceutical companies (20/361; 6%) were the next most common. Tobacco articles used documents from repositories; pharmaceutical documents were from a range of sources. Most included articles relied upon internal company documents obtained through litigation (350/361; 97%). The research questions posed were primarily about company strategies to promote or position the company and its products (326/361; 90%). Most articles (346/361; 96%) used information from miscellaneous documents such as memos or letters, or from unspecified types of documents. When explicit information about study funding was provided (290/361 articles), the most common source was the US-based National Cancer Institute. We developed an alternative and more sensitive search targeted at identifying additional research articles using internal pharmaceutical company documents, but the search retrieved an impractical number of citations for review. Conclusions: Internal company documents provide an excellent source of information on health topics (e.g., corporate behavior, study data) exemplified by articles based on tobacco industry documents. Pharmaceutical and other industry documents appear to have been less used for research, indicating a need for funding for this type of research and well-indexed and curated repositories to provide researchers with ready access to the documents. © 2014 Wieland et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0094709; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84900444377&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24800999; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t003; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0094709; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t004; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094709; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094709.t002
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know