Comparison of glucose and lipid metabolic gene expressions between fat and lean lines of rainbow trout after a glucose load
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 9, Issue: 8, Page: e105548
2014
- 52Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations52
- Citation Indexes52
- 52
- CrossRef39
- Captures43
- Readers43
- 43
Article Description
Two experimental rainbow trout lines developed through divergent selection for low (Lean 'L' line) or high (Fat 'F' line) muscle fat content were used as models to study the genetic determinism of fat depots. Previous nutritional studies suggested that the F line had a better capability to use glucose than the L line during feeding trials. Based on that, we put forward the hypothesis that F line has a greater metabolic ability to clear a glucose load effectively, compared to L line. In order to test this hypothesis, 250 mg/kg glucose was intraperitoneally injected to the two rainbow trout lines fasted for 48 h. Hyperglycemia was observed after glucose treatment in both lines without affecting the phosphorylation of AMPK (cellular energy sensor) and Akt-TOR (insulin signaling) components. Liver glucokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression levels were increased by glucose, whereas mRNA levels of β-oxidation enzymes (CPT1a, CPT1b, HOAD and ACO) were down-regulated in the white skeletal muscle of both lines. Regarding the genotype effect, concordant with normoglycemia at 12 h after glucose treatment, higher muscle glycogen was found in F line compared to L line which exhibited hyperglycemia. Moreover, mRNA levels of hepatic glycolytic enzymes (GK, 6PFK and PK), gluconeogenic enzyme PEPCK and muscle fatty acid oxidation enzymes (CPT1a, CPT1b and HOAD) were concurrently higher in the F line. Overall, these findings suggest that F line may have a better ability to maintain glucose homeostasis than L line. © 2014 Jin et al.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0105548; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g008; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g007; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g002
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84940238521&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25141351; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g008; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g008; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g007; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g008; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g007; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g006; http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0105548; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548&type=printable; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0105548&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0105548; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g007; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g008; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548.g003; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0105548
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know