Relationship between anaerobic capacity estimated using a single effort and 30-s tethered running outcomes
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 12, Issue: 2, Page: e0172032
2017
- 18Citations
- 54Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef8
- Captures54
- Readers54
- 54
Article Description
The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relationship between alternative anaerobic capacity method (MAOD) and a 30-s all-out tethered running test. Fourteen male recreational endurance runners underwent a graded exercise test, a supramaximal exhaustive effort and a 30-s all-out test on different days, interspaced by 48h. After verification of data normality (Shapiro-Wilk test), the Pearson's correlation test was used to verify the association between the anaerobic estimates from the MAOD and the 30-s all-out tethered running outputs. Absolute MAOD was correlated with mean power (r = 0.58; P = 0.03), total work (r = 0.57; P = 0.03), and mean force (r = 0.79; P = 0.001). In addition, energy from the glycolytic pathway (E) was correlated with mean power (r = 0.58; P = 0.03). Significant correlations were also found at each 5s interval between absolute MAOD and force values (r between 0.75 and 0.84), and between force values and E (r between 0.73 to 0.80). In conclusion, the associations between absolute MAOD and the mechanical outputs from the 30-s all-out tethered running test evidenced the importance of the anaerobic capacity for maintaining force during the course of time in short efforts.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0172032; 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g003; 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g006; 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g001
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85012108392&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28182775; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g003; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g006; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g006; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g006; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g006; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g001; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032&type=printable; http://www.plosone.org/article/metrics/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0172032&type=printable; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g005; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g006; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t001; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.t002; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032; http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0172032; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g004; http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172032.g003
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know