Exploration of the factors related to selfefficacy among psychiatric nurses
PLoS ONE, ISSN: 1932-6203, Vol: 15, Issue: 4, Page: e0230740
2020
- 5Citations
- 86Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef4
- Captures86
- Readers86
- 86
Article Description
The average length of hospital stay in the psychiatric ward is longer, and the risk of patientto- nurse violence is higher than that in other departments. Therefore, psychiatric nurses' work environment may differ from that of other nurses. The factors related to psychiatric nurses' self-efficacy may also differ from those of general workers or other nurses. Mental health care that considers the characteristics of psychiatric nurses requires exploration of self-efficacy unique to psychiatric nurses. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore the distinct factors related to psychiatric nurses' self-efficacy. The developed 24 items related to improvement in self-efficacy and 25 items related to decrease in self-efficacy were examined. The Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale was used to measure the validity of the factors. To extract the factors of self-efficacy, data from 132 nurses and assistant nurses who provided informed consent were analyzed, and the reliability and validity of the factors were calculated. The factors associated with improvement in self-efficacy were "Positive reactions by patients," "Ability to positively change nurse-patient relationship," and "Practicability of appropriate nursing." The factors associated with decrease in self-efficacy were "Uncertainty in psychiatric nursing" and "Nurses' role loss." The Cronbach's α for all factors exceeded .70. Of the five factors, four had significant weak-to-moderate correlations with the Japanese version of the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale; therefore, the validity was quantitatively confirmed with four factors. Interventions based on these four factors may improve psychiatric nurses' self-efficacy. Additionally, it is possible that this tool assesses the unique facets of self-efficacy rather than psychiatric nurses' general self-efficacy. Interventions to improve psychiatric nurses' self-efficacy based on the characteristics of psychiatry are needed.
Bibliographic Details
10.1371/journal.pone.0230740; 10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t004; 10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t005; 10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t001; 10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g002; 10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t003
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082842159&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32240210; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t004; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t004; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t005; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t005; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t001; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t001; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g002; https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t003; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t005; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t003; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t002; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g001; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.g001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/figure?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740.t004; https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0230740&type=printable
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know