Less Intense Postacute Care, Better Outcomes For Enrollees In Medicare Advantage Than Those In Fee-For-Service.

Citation data:

Health affairs (Project Hope), ISSN: 1544-5208, Vol: 36, Issue: 1, Page: 91-100

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 235
Abstract Views 185
Link-outs 50
Captures 55
Exports-Saves 32
Readers 23
Mentions 2
Blog Mentions 1
News Mentions 1
Social Media 4
Tweets 4
PMID:
28069851
DOI:
10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1027
Author(s):
Huckfeldt, Peter J, Escarce, José J, Rabideau, Brendan, Karaca-Mandic, Pinar, Sood, Neeraj
Publisher(s):
Health Affairs (Project Hope)
Tags:
Medicine
Most Recent Tweet View All Tweets
Most Recent Blog Mention
Most Recent News Mention
article description
Traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare's prospective payment systems for postacute care provide little incentive to coordinate care or control costs. In contrast, Medicare Advantage plans pay for postacute care out of monthly capitated payments and thus have stronger incentives to use it efficiently. We compared the use of postacute care in skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities by enrollees in Medicare Advantage and FFS Medicare after hospital discharge for three high-volume conditions: lower extremity joint replacement, stroke, and heart failure. After accounting for differences in patient characteristics at discharge, we found lower intensity of postacute care for Medicare Advantage patients compared to FFS Medicare patients discharged from the same hospital, across all three conditions. Medicare Advantage patients also exhibited better outcomes than their FFS Medicare counterparts, including lower rates of hospital readmission and higher rates of return to the community. These findings suggest that payment reforms such as bundling in FFS Medicare may reduce the intensity of postacute care without adversely affecting patient health.

This article has 0 Wikipedia mention.