The movement at the Congress. The anti-gender movement network between rhetorical devices, grassroots participation, knowledge and political alliances.
Polis (Italy), ISSN: 1120-9488, Vol: 33, Issue: 2, Page: 323-338
2019
- 6Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
This essay aims to strengthen the connections between ongoing reflections on the diffusion of anti-gender protests and social movement studies. Starting from the scrutiny of the recent World Congress of Families (Verona, 29-31 March 2019), it makes a plea for recognizing the unvaried centrality of gender relations as a field of conflict. Afterwards, it bridges the contents of three recent publications on anti-gender mobilizations with pivotal concepts in social movement studies. First, the fabrication of the gender rhetorical device at the hands of the Vatican is bridged with the construction of collective identities and with movement framing strategies. Second, attention is paid explicitly to movement knowledge practices as a paramount component of broader anti-gender protest repertoires. Thirdly, patterns of institutionalization are discussed by looking at cognitive and practical convergences between movement and party actors in the institutional arena.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know