Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending
Materialpruefung/Materials Testing, ISSN: 2195-8572, Vol: 66, Issue: 10, Page: 1666-1677
2024
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Data on Materials Testing Detailed by a Researcher at Sakarya University (Optimization of springback parameters of an aluminum 1050 alloy by V-bending)
2024 AUG 27 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Tech Daily News -- Data detailed on materials testing have been presented. According
Article Description
Springback, one of the fundamental properties of parts formed by V bending, is the dimensional deviation caused by elastic recovery. Numerical estimation and compensation of springback is essential because it affects the workpiece's dimensional accuracy and geometry and will cause serious errors, especially during the assembly process. This study investigated the effects of process parameters such as sheet thickness and die angle on springback behavior on 1,050 aluminum experimentally and numerically. Experiments were planned according to Taguchi's L9 orthogonal array. Sheet thickness (1 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.5 mm) and die angle (90, 135 and 150°), were selected as forming parameters. Springback was calculated after the tests. Optimization of the parameters was evaluated using the signal/noise ratio approach. The effectiveness of parameters on results was determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA). It has been observed that the springback angle decreases with increasing sheet thickness, but springback angle decreases with increasing die angles. It has been seen that the experimental and numerical study results confirm each other. The variance analysis determined that the die angle was the most dominant springback parameter (90.9 %). Second is the sheet thickness (5.79 %).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know