Prioritising, Ranking and Resource Implementation - A Normative Analysis.

Citation data:

International journal of health policy and management, ISSN: 2322-5939, Vol: 7, Issue: 6, Page: 532-541

Publication Year:
2018
Captures 1
Readers 1
PMID:
29935130
DOI:
10.15171/ijhpm.2017.125
Author(s):
Sandman, Lars
Tags:
Medicine
article description
Priority setting in publicly financed healthcare systems should be guided by ethical norms and other considerations viewed as socially valuable, and we find several different approaches for how such norms and considerations guide priorities in healthcare decision-making. Common to many of these approaches is that interventions are ranked in relation to each other, following the application of these norms and considerations, and that this ranking list is then translated into a coverage scheme. In the literature we find at least two different views on how a ranking list should be translated into coverage schemes: (1) rationing from the bottom where everything below a certain ranking order is rationed; or (2) a relative degree of coverage, where higher ranked interventions are given a relatively larger share of resources than lower ranked interventions according to some "curve of coverage."