Comparative analysis of curvilinear gears with produced by the new production method
Journal of Testing and Evaluation, ISSN: 0090-3973, Vol: 44, Issue: 1, Page: 222-229
2016
- 2Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In this study, we describe the finite element model analysis of novel pinion gears having a curvilinear teeth profile which were previously manufactured by us for the first time with the highest accuracy. Herringbone and spur gears were also modeled by using the same approach in order to compare the advantages of each, both under actual-working-and stress-conditions. Additionally, these three gear types were compared through noise analysis for the first time as well. All these analyses suggest that the concave-convex type gears display superiority in load resistance and show reasonably low levels of noise.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959524558&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/jte20140095; https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/testingevaluation/article/44/1/222/1191006/Comparative-Analysis-of-Curvilinear-Gears-With; http://www.astm.org/doiLink.cgi?JTE20140095; https://dx.doi.org/10.1520/jte20140095; https://www.astm.org/jte20140095.html
ASTM International
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know