COMPETENCE COEFFICIENTS CALCULATION METHOD OF PARTICIPANTS IN GROUP DECISION-MAKING FOR SELECTING THE BEST ALTERNATIVE WITH THE MULTIVARIATE OF THE RESULT
Informatics and Automation, ISSN: 2713-3206, Vol: 23, Issue: 1, Page: 169-193
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The problem of obtaining the best alternative using decision-making methods based on the experience of specialists and mathematical calculations is considered in the article. Group decision-making is appropriate for solving this problem. However, it can lead to the selection of several best alternatives (multivariate of the result). Accounting for competence will prioritize the decision of more competent participants and eliminate the emergence of several best alternatives in the process of group decision-making. The problem of determining the competence coefficients for participants in group decision-making has been formulated. The selection of the best alternative with the multivariate of the result is provided in the problem. A method for solving the problem has been developed. It involves discretizing the range of input variables and refining the competence coefficients values of group decision-making participants in it to select the best alternative, either by the majority principle or with the decision-maker's involvement. Further calculation of the competence coefficients for participants in group decision-making is carried out using local linear interpolation of the refined competence coefficient at surrounding points from the discretized range. The use of the proposed method for solving the problem is considered using the example of group decision-making according to the main types of the majoritarian principle for selecting an electrodeposition variant. The results show that the proposed method for calculating the competence coefficients of participants in group decision-making through local linear interpolation is the most effective for selecting the best alternative with a multivariate result based on the relative majority.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know