Evolution of oswestry 2.0 Questionnaire and the Physical Component (PCS) of SF-36 during the first postoperative year of lumbar spine fusion in degenerative diseases
Coluna/ Columna, ISSN: 1808-1851, Vol: 12, Issue: 2, Page: 128-132
2013
- 6Citations
- 19,367Usage
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective: Assess the clinical improvement of patients undergoing decompression and posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative diseases, evaluating the evolution of the scores of Oswestry 2.0 questionnaire and the physical component (PCS) of the SF-36 scale. Methods: Prospective study of 19 patients with degenerative disc disease (disc herniation, lumbar stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis) that underwent decompression and posterolateral arthrodesis. All patients included in our study answered the questionnaire Oswestry 2.0 and the PCS of SF-36 at five different occasions: in the preoperative period and 45, 90, 180 and 360 days after surgery. Results: The scores of Oswestry 2.0 questionnaire and the physical component (PCS) of the SF-36 of the patients showed significant improvement (p<0.001 and p=0.004 respectively) over a year of postoperative follow-up. There was no significant difference in improvement in these scores when comparing the diagnoses made (disc herniation, lumbar stenosis or degenerative spondylolisthesis), sex of patients, and individuals aged up to fifty years and those over fifty years. Conclusion: There was an improvement in Oswestry scores and physical component (PCS) of the SF-36 in patients with degenerative lumbar spine unresponsive to conservative treatment that underwent surgical decompression and arthrodesis after one year of postoperative follow-up.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84881256820&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1808-18512013000200007; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512013000200007&lng=pt&tlng=pt; http://www.scielo.br/pdf/coluna/v12n2/07.pdf; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512013000200007&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1808-18512013000200007&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512013000200007; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1808-18512013000200007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1808-18512013000200007; https://www.scielo.br/j/coluna/a/zvRB6Qhz8hFJmCkMMdcM9wd/?lang=pt
FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know