The effects of smart formative assessment system on academic achievement and course process
Hacettepe Egitim Dergisi, ISSN: 1300-5340, Vol: 36, Issue: 2, Page: 333-349
2021
- 2Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Smart formative assessment system was designed to support the problems teachers encountered in the course process. This system evaluated students’ pre-existing knowledge, their gained knowledge after the course, their learning styles and multiple intelligence types and presented suggestions to the teachers for the course process in regard to the expert system method, one of artificial intelligence methods. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of a smart formative assessment system on students' academic achievement levels and course process. Through sequential explanatory design of mixed research methods, two biology teachers and 122 grade 10 students participated in the study. The results indicated that the smart formative assessment system increased the students’ academic success levels. In addition, it was found that the smart formative assessment system not only drove the teachers to use individualized methods in their course process, but also facilitated the implementation of formative assessment in their courses. As a result, some suggestions are made for testing smart formative assessment systems to teach different topic(s), courses and possible smart formative assessment systems that will be prepared for formative assessment.
Bibliographic Details
Hacettepe University Journal of Education
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know