Violencias encubiertas de la gobernanza global
Estudios Políticos (Medellín), ISSN: 0121-5167, Vol: 0, Issue: 49, Page: 148-166
2016
- 437Usage
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
El artículo problematiza las premisas ontológicas con las que la gobernanza global -como concepto y como proyecto político- se concibe y cómo esto institucionaliza y perpetúa la exclusión a través de violencias encubiertas que habilitan ciertas formas de ser y estar en el mundo, entre ellas, procesos de construcción del otro, la aceptación de una manera de conocer la realidad, restringiendo la posibilidad de pensar lo político global por otras vías. A partir de un enfoque crítico que toma argumentos posestructuralistas y poscolonialistas de las Relaciones Internacionales, se propone que existen alternativas que provienen de cosmovisiones diferentes que no solo pueden utilizarse para abordar los problemas desde otras perspectivas, que dan luces sobre otra forma de pensar la gobernanza global.
Bibliographic Details
https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/estudiospoliticos/article/view/23716; http://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/estudiospoliticos/article/download/23716/20779561; http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n49a08; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-51672016000200008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-51672016000200008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-51672016000200008; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-51672016000200008; https://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n49a08
Universidad de Antioquia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know