Negative pressure protective barrier device used in dental emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic
Iatreia, ISSN: 0121-0793, Vol: 35, Issue: 1, Page: 29-39
2022
- 79Usage
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Introduction: Health personnel involved in dental care are at high risk of contagion from constant ex-posure to aerosols during emergency care. It is neces-sary to increase its protection measures during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Objective: Describe the experience of dentists, assistants and patients regarding the use of a barrier device to contain aerosols in dental emergency care. Materials and methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study with 21 adult patients attended by dental emergencies in a private institution during June in the city of Bogotá. The 21 patients, five treating dentists and five dental assistants filled out a structured question-naire about the experience with the device, the bio-safety measures implemented and the perception of safety regarding the possible contagion of the virus. Results: The mean age of the patients was 41 years (SD ± 14). The duration of the procedures was 45 mi-nutes (SD ± 12) on average. There were no adverse events during the procedures with the use of the devi-ce. 95% of patients felt safer during care with the use of the barrier device. Conclusions: Despite the limited sample, the high perception of safety regarding the use of the device in dental emergency care reported here suggests that they may complement the biosecurity measures and personal protective equipment established by health authorities during the pandemic.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85124612713&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.iatreia.106; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-07932022000100029&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-07932022000100029&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-07932022000100029; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-07932022000100029
Universidad de Antioquia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know