Investigating Digital Reading in L2 to Criticize and to Summarize: Working Memory Capacity and Reading Purpose Influencing Strategy
Lingüística y Literatura, ISSN: 0120-5587, Vol: 41, Issue: 78, Page: 320-351
2020
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Abstract: The construction of meaning and inference generation considering low- and high- working memory span when readers read digital texts in L2 to criticize and to summarize were examined. Data collection included Reading Span Test, verbal protocol and post-reading tasks. The low-span group showed more misunderstandings in both purposes and a significant result of moderate correlation between reading time and reading to summarize. Both groups made more metacognitive comments when reading hypertexts to summarize and found strategies to cope with the demands of the nonlinear hypertext.
Bibliographic Details
https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/lyl/article/view/343886; https://revistas.udea.edu.co/index.php/lyl/article/download/343886/20803801; http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n78a13; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-55872020000200320&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0120-55872020000200320&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-55872020000200320; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0120-55872020000200320; https://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.lyl.n78a13
Universidad de Antioquia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know