DAS SEIN AND L’ÊTRE – HEIDEGGER AND SARTRE, TWO PHENOMENOLOGIES, TWO QUESTIONS ABOUT REALITY
Roczniki Filozoficzne, ISSN: 2450-002X, Vol: 72, Issue: 4, Page: 155-175
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The aim of this paper is to elicit the main ontological assumptions underlying two phenomenologies: Martin Heidegger’s and Jean-Paul Sartre’s. In the first part, the concept of the phenomenon is outlined in the horizon of the question about Heideggerian Sein and Sartrean être. Remaining within the same horizon, the second part raises the issue of essence and broadly comprehended understanding. During the analysis, the phenomenal and metaphysical realms are identified in the project of French philosopher, which are then compared with the ontic and ontological levels, areas that emerge in the German phenomenologist’s thought thanks to the development of ontological difference. The conclusion drawn from the presented article could be formulated in the thesis that for Sartre the core of reality consists in the absurd, metaphysical basis placed outside the phenomenon and understanding (and completely independent of them), while according to Heidegger the reality’s kernel is the prephenomenal (and not extra-phenomenal) source of meaning, “being” and happening only through the dynamics of phenomenon and understanding.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know