DBA's perspective on use of information visualization in electronic health records
Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, ISSN: 2040-7467, Vol: 7, Issue: 16, Page: 3320-3331
2014
- 10Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
Article Description
DBA's perspective for Information Visualization (IV) assists in providing a detailed insight about patient history in Electronic Health Records (EHR). These data visualizations are used by different stake holders in public hospitals such as Doctors, Database Administrators (DBA) and visual designers in order to improve health services for patients. This is not possible without the contribution of DBAs, who are directly involved in launching efficient query system and required data retrieval for resulting visualization. EHR database is comprising of different forms of data i.e., numbers, texts, pictures and graphs resulting in a challenge for creating a meaningful visualization for single or multiple patients. DBAs have EHR knowledge gaps, lesser exposure to the transformation process of data into effective visualization and understanding about IV limitations result in poor and less efficient IV tools. This study highlights the challenging factors that affect DBAs in understanding, developing and controlling EHR visualization. These factors are selected after a literature review and further analysis by a questionnaire based study on DBAs in two different government hospitals. This will help in highlighting the limitations of DBAs skills and experience and assist in determining the contribution of their role in the development of future IV applications. This work is a second phase of our ongoing research for designing a model, CARE 1.0, as a future IV solution in multiple EHR. © Maxwell Scientific Organization, 2014.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84901336611&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.677; http://maxwellsci.com/jp/mspabstract.php?jid=RJASET&doi=rjaset.7.677; https://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.7.677; https://maxwellsci.com/jp/mspabstract.php?jid=RJASET&doi=rjaset.7.677
Maxwell Scientific Publication Corp.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know