Radiomic features as biomarkers of soft tissue paediatric sarcomas: Preliminary results of a PET/MR study
Radiology and Oncology, ISSN: 1581-3207, Vol: 56, Issue: 2, Page: 138-141
2022
- 7Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef5
- Captures3
- Readers3
Article Description
Background: Pediatric soft tissue sarcomas are rare tumors with rhabdomyosarcoma being the most frequent histotype. Diagnostic imaging plays a significant role in the evaluation of this type of tumors. Thus, aim of this study was to assess the prognostic and diagnostic value of radiomic features extracted from axial T2w images of the primary lesion in children with soft tissue sarcomas examined by PET/MR for staging. Methods: Using an open source software, each lesion was segmented and 33 radiomic features then extracted. Factor and logistic regression analyses were applied to select highly correlating features and evaluate their prognostic role, respectively. Differences in radiomic, demographics, metabolic, and laboratory variables according to tumor grade and histotype were investigated by the Students' and Chi-square tests. In case of differences the diagnostic value of the variable/s was assessed by receiver operating curves. Results: Eighteen children (11 female; mean age 7.8 ± 4.6-year-old) matched the inclusion criteria. The factor analysis allowed the selection of five highly correlating features which, according to regression analysis, did not influence the outcome (p > 0.05, each). The feature lmc1 was significantly higher in low grade lesions (p = 0.045) and showed 70.4% accuracy in classifying high grade tumors while the feature variance was significantly lower in rhabdomyosarcomas (p = 0.008) and showed 83.3% accuracy for this histotype. Conclusions: In conclusion, our preliminary results suggest that specific radiomic features may act as biomarkers of pediatric soft tissue sarcoma grade and histotype.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128505266&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0013; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35344641; https://www.sciendo.com/article/10.2478/raon-2022-0013; https://dx.doi.org/10.2478/raon-2022-0013; https://sciendo.com/article/10.2478/raon-2022-0013
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know