Phylogenetic tree analysis based on the 16S sequence alignment for Klebsiella spp. Isolated from different sources
Iraqi Journal of Science, ISSN: 2312-1637, Vol: 60, Issue: 12, Page: 2618-2628
2019
- 4Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequences used to study bacterial phylogeny and taxonomy have been by far the most common housekeeping genetic marker utilized for identification and ancestor determination. This study aimed to investigate, for the first time, the relationship between Klebsiella spp. isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Iraq. Fifty Klebsiella spp. isolates were isolated from clinical and environmental sources. Twenty-five isolates were collected from a fresh vegetable (Apium graveolens) and 25 from clinical samples (sputum, wound swab, urine). Enteric bacteria were isolated on selective and differential media and identified by an automatic identification system, vitek-2. The total DNA was extracted and PCR amplified for selected isolates. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified by using the universal primer 27F (5'- AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG- 3') and 1492R (5'-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT- 3'). The 16SrRNA gene sequence was analysed among some local isolates, and the results were compared with the standard data of similar registered strains in NCBI. The most common species of Klebsiella was Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumoniae (Kpp), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae ozaenae (Kpo) and Klebsiella oxytoca (Ko). The results of the identification of species and sub species by using the biochemical test (vitek-2) were more precise than those obtained by the use of the universal primer.Phylogenetic tree strategies have clearly indicated a relatively close similarity amongst all analysed Klebsiella isolates and revealed the intra-species genetic distance between the individual isolates of the Klebsiella spp. In conclusion, our results revealed the main advantage of using universal primers for the identification of Klebsiella spp. and their root from nature.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85080148364&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2019.60.12.10; https://ijs.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/eijs/article/view/1363; https://ijs.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/eijs/article/download/1363/692; https://dx.doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2019.60.12.10
University of Baghdad College of Science
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know