Evaluation of wearable inertial sensors for spacesuit design applications using hardware-in-the-loop simulation
AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum, Vol: 1 PartF
2020
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Conference Paper Description
A high rate of injury is currently observed for spaceflight crewmembers when performing extravehicular activity or when training for extravehicular activity. Although it is known that this is due to adverse human interactions with the spacesuit, designing a spacesuit to reduce the incidence of injury proves difficult due to the inability to observe the motion of the crewmember inside the suit. As part of an effort to develop a wearable in-suit inertial sensor system for studying human motion inside spacesuits, the current work presents an approach to simulating the performance of wearable IMU systems. The simulation enables rapid evaluation of different hardware architectures for the wearable sensor system so that the large trade space in which the architectures reside can be explored before any hardware is fabricated, which reduces development cost and timeline. The simulation uses optical motion capture data of human motions as a source of ground truth and corrupts this with measurement errors including sensor noise captured from bench-top tests of IMUs under consideration for inclusion in the wearable system. Sample results verifying the accuracy of the simulation are presented, and directions for future work are discussed.
Bibliographic Details
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know