Surfing Chaotic Perturbations in Interplanetary Multi-Flyby Trajectories: Augmented Picard-Chebyshev Integration for Parallel and GPU Computing Architectures
AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition, AIAA SciTech Forum 2022
2022
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Conference Paper Description
The computational intensity of the trajectory design problem severely affects the development time of any space mission, both in its preliminary phase and in the consequent optimization. This paper presents a formulation of the design problem that can account for any force source in the dynamical model through efficient Picard-Chebyshev numerical simulations. A two-level augmentation of the integration scheme is proposed, to run an arbitrary number of simulations within the same algorithm call, fully exploiting high performance and GPU computing facilities. The performances obtained with implementation in C and NVIDIA CUDA programming languages are shown, highlighting possible use cases and paradigms for the efficient use of GPU computing architectures.
Bibliographic Details
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know