Il finanziamento dell'universit� italiana. Un confronto con l'Inghilterra usando i bilanci degli atenei
2009
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Dataset Description
Secondo Aghion at al. (2007, 2008, 2010), la performance di ricerca degli atenei � positivamente correlata all'ammontare complessivo di risorse a disposizione. In questo lavoro si discute il tema del finanziamento dell?universit� italiana utilizzando un approccio comparato: i bilanci delle universit� inglesi vengono confrontati con i bilanci delle universit� italiane. I dati si riferiscono al 2007/08. Lo scopo � comprendere se e in quale misura il sistema universitario italiano � sotto-finanziato prendendo come riferimento uno dei migliori sistemi universitari al mondo. Queste le principali conclusioni. Il sistema universitario inglese dispone di molte pi� risorse finanziarie rispetto a quello italiano. Le risorse provengono da diverse fonti, pubbliche e private. Se si pesano correttamente gli studenti fuori-corso, non emergono differenze apprezzabili nel finanziamento pubblico corrente tra i due sistemi (FFO e Recurrent Grants). Esistono tuttavia differenze rilevanti nella quota de...
Bibliographic Details
Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know