On the Feminist Thought and Science
Letras (Peru), ISSN: 2071-5072, Vol: 89, Issue: 130, Page: 51-78
2018
- 5Citations
- 53Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This article deals with the relationship between feminism and science. First, we will offer a panoramic view of the various positions regar-ding feminist thought and its contribution to the fields of the Theory of Knowledge and the Philosophy of Science; we will present the doctrines of Sandra Harding and Susan Haack, which show the polarization between positions that totally reject the conception and practice of past and present science, considering it absolutely androcentric, in front of those who maintain that science has nothing to do with gender, therefore the only idea of a feminist epistemology is incongruent. Then, finally, we will make an analysis of the above, reaffirming concepts that we consi-der realistic and rejecting those we deem erroneous or exaggerated, to reach our own conclusions, emphasizing the importance of not overloo-king points of view traditionally considered marginal.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116326324&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.30920/letras.89.130.3; http://revista.letras.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/le/article/view/607; http://revista.letras.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/le/article/download/607/526; http://revista.letras.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/le/article/download/607/703; http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-50722018000200003&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2071-50722018000200003&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-50722018000200003; http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S2071-50722018000200003; https://dx.doi.org/10.30920/letras.89.130.3
Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know