Curriculum Review and Revision at the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine.

Citation data:

Journal of veterinary medical education, ISSN: 0748-321X, Vol: 44, Issue: 3, Page: 459-470

Publication Year:
2017
Usage 14
Abstract Views 10
Link-outs 4
PMID:
28876985
DOI:
10.3138/jvme.0217-029r
Author(s):
Root Kustritz, Margaret V, Molgaard, Laura K, Malone, Erin
Publisher(s):
University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)
Tags:
Social Sciences, Veterinary
article description
Curriculum review is an essential part of ongoing curriculum development, and is a mandate of the American Veterinary Medical Association Council on Education (AVMA COE), the accrediting body of all North American schools and colleges of veterinary medicine. This article describes the steps in curriculum review undertaken by the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine (UMN CVM) in response to this mandate from the COE and to a recommendation from a recent collegiate review that was part of a larger university-level strategic planning effort. The challenges of reviewing and revising the curriculum within a short time frame were met by appointing a dedicated curriculum review board and by engaging students and faculty groups, both as focus groups and as specific faculty work sections within disciplines. Faculty voting on the process was very valuable as it permitted the curriculum review board and faculty groups to move ahead knowing there was a process in place for reassessment if most faculty did not agree with recommendations. Consistent support from the dean of the college and other administrators was vital in helping maintain momentum for curriculum review.

This article has 0 Wikipedia reference.