Analysis of learning strategies of the Public Accounting program: Distance Uniminuto with MSLQ scale
European Public and Social Innovation Review, ISSN: 2529-9824, Vol: 9, Page: 1-17
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Introduction: This article analyzes the factors related to the promotion of good educational practices that improve the academic performance of students in the distance learning Public Accounting program at the Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios. Methodology: A systematic literature review and a descriptive methodological approach were conducted. The population included 441 students, with a representative sample of 100 students who completed the MSLQ (Motivated Strategies Learning Questionnaire) through simple random sampling. The relationship between motivation, learning strategies, and academic performance was evaluated. Results: A positive correlation was identified between academic performance, good educational practices, and acquired competencies. The Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient analysis showed internal consistency among the evaluated factors, suggesting a significant relationship with academic and professional success. Discussion: The study highlights the importance of reflective and guided pedagogical strategies in the academic and research development of students, influencing their autonomy and professional success. Conclusions: The implementation of pedagogical strategies that foster student autonomy is recommended, contributing to the academic and professional success of Public Accounting students.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know