Numerical flow field prediction downstream of axial guide vane swirl generator
Chemical Engineering Transactions, ISSN: 2283-9216, Vol: 39, Issue: Special Issue, Page: 907-912
2014
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper utilizes current state of art in CFD simulations suitable for engineering application. The object of interest is an axial guide vane swirl generator often found in process burners. The aim is to validate available turbulence models suitable for flow field prediction in industrial combustors. The grid independence study on four grids supports choice of used grid. Influence of the outlet shape on the flow field inside the chamber and especially on recirculation zone shape is proved. Last, the comparison of the three turbulence models is provided. The most accurate is identified the Reynolds Stress turbulence model. Predicted velocity fields are compared with the measured data obtained from the literature. CFD predictions of all the turbulence models underestimate peak axial velocity and overestimate velocity in central recirculation zone on the chamber axis..
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know