PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Correction to: Path Planning of Spacecraft Cluster Orbit Reconstruction Based on ALPIO (Remote Sensing, (2022), 14, 19, (4768), 10.3390/rs14194768)

Remote Sensing, ISSN: 2072-4292, Vol: 15, Issue: 6
2023
  • 0
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 0
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Correction Description

In the original article [1], “strong robustness [12]” was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in “Section 1”, “Paragraph 3”, and should read: “strong robustness [12,13]”. In the original article, “C-W equation” was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in “Section 2”, “Section 2.2”, “Paragraph 1”, and should read: “C-W equation [20]”. In the original article, “The velocities v(i) and v(i) before and after the maneuver at the ith discrete point” was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in “Section 3”, “Section 3.1”, “Paragraph 1”, and should read: “The velocities v(i) and v(i) before and after the maneuver at the ith discrete point are expressed as follows [21]”. In the original article, “Figure 4” was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in “Section 3”, “Section 3.2.2”, “Paragraph 1”, and should read: “Figure 4. (a) Path entering the dangerous area and (b) path not entering the dangerous area [29]”. In the original article, “Cauchy mutation” was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in “Section 4”, “Section 4.4”, “Paragraph 3”, and should read: “Cauchy mutation [34]”. In the original article, “The second stage of the PIO is the landmark operator” was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in “Section 4”, “Section 4.5”, “Paragraph 1”, and should read: “The second stage of the PIO is the landmark operator [11]”. In the original article, “Gaussian mutation” was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in “Section 4”, “Section 4.5”, “Paragraph 2”, and should read: “Gaussian mutation [35]”. In the original article, “CGAPIO” was not cited. The citation has now been inserted in “Section 5”, “Section 5.1”, “Paragraph 1”, and should read: “CGAPIO [35]”. Due to adding new References, the numeration of References with respect to the original publication has been modified. References [2,3,4,5,6,7] will appear in the document as References [13,20,21,29,34,35] respectively. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original publication has also been updated.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know