Methodological notes for decolonizing dignity in the common goods’ configuration of justice
Onati Socio-Legal Series, ISSN: 2079-5971, Vol: 14, Issue: 2, Page: 321-347
2024
- 1Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
Article Description
In the current wave of movements advocating for the protection of the Commons in the Global South, this article asserts that the attainment of human dignity is inherently tied to acknowledging the dignity of all life forms, a concept termed as “the-more-than-human”. The article presents a dual argument. Firstly, it contends that without recognizing the dignity of all life, genuine human dignity remains unachievable. Secondly, it calls for the decolonization of the philosophical foundations that prioritize a singular model of dignity for humanity. Consequently, the article emphasizes the necessity of acknowledging multiple dignities to effectively safeguard the Commons from both legal and philosophical perspectives. It argues that prevailing philosophical frameworks of human dignity present obstacles to the protection of the Commons hence it advocates for their reevaluation and restructuring.
Bibliographic Details
Onati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know