Content Analysis of Integrated Reporting in Malaysia
WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, ISSN: 2224-2899, Vol: 21, Page: 1064-1082
2024
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
The aim of integrated reporting is to provide a holistic view of an organization’s performance and value creation. This comprehensive reporting framework contains financial, economic, environmental, social, and governance aspects. In Malaysia, the adoption of integrated reporting shows the organization’s involvement in promoting accountability and transparency in corporate reporting. By using the Malaysian top 100 publicly listed companies (PLCs), this study gauges the practices of integrated reporting disclosure, explicitly investigating the integration of the content elements recommended by the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC) Framework. The examination of the integrated reports of the sample of Malaysian PLCs is done via a content analysis approach. Sampling from 2018 – 2020 data, this study is beneficial to contribute to the current body of literature on integrated reporting by shedding light on the ongoing practices of PLCs in Malaysia. This study has implications not only in advancing knowledge but also increases reporting practices within business and economics environments. Additionally, it adds valuable insights to the ongoing discussions surrounding corporate transparency and accountability. Furthermore, the study will present recommendations for enhancing the content of integrated reports, ultimately strengthening the reliability and utility of the disclosed information. These recommendations can be used by regulators, standard-setting bodies, and companies to further develop and refine integrated reporting practices in Malaysia.
Bibliographic Details
World Scientific and Engineering Academy and Society (WSEAS)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know