Business history: State of the art and controversies
Entreprises et Histoire, ISSN: 1161-2770, Vol: 55, Issue: 2, Page: 11-23
2009
- 7Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In the first section an attempt is made to characterize the actual phase of business history that every scholar who reflects on the state of the disciplinea's art would define as a'post-Chandleriana. Examining the major critiques to Chandlera's work, the author then proceeds to single out which teachings of the great Harvard researcher and scholar are still useful today. In part two the author assesses what seems to be the most promising fields for future research, identifying four topics: (a) the study of the new forms of organization brought about by the Third Industrial Revolution, (b) the historical perspective of globalization, (c) issues related to the relationship between enterprise, society and culture, and (d) entrepreneurship. In the third and final part, the author analyzes the complicated cultural plight of business history which needs to deal with three different and well-structured areas of studies (i.e., economics, managerial sciences, and history).
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know