Performance of pig slurry based microbial fuel cell during energy recovery and waste treatment
Desalination and Water Treatment, ISSN: 1944-3986, Vol: 64, Page: 31-39
2017
- 6Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The performance of two single-chamber air cathode microbial fuel cells (MFCs) fed with pig slurry (MFC1) and synthetic wastewater (MFC2) were studied for energy recovery and waste treatment by applying three different flow recirculation (mixing intensities). The flow recirculation in the MFCs was an important factor on the performance of the MFCs. During pig slurry treatment, the maximum power density was 27.7 mW m –2 without flow recirculation. The highest removal of chemical oxygen demand (COD) (89.8%), ammoniacal nitrogen (NH 4 -N) (78.2%), total phosphorus (TP) (36.3%), and total suspended solids (TSS) (95%) were achieved under 74 mL min –1 of flow recirculation. In order to compare the electricity production in the MFC fed with pig slurry, one MFC was fed with synthetic wastewater. Lower power densities were obtained using synthetic wastewater (0.5–3.8 mW m –2 ). The maximum removal of COD, NH 4 -N, TP, and TSS during synthetic wastewater treatment was obtained applying at a flow recirculation of 152 mL min –1. The SEM image and EDX spectrum in cation-exchange membrane from MFC1, showed the presence of struvite on membrane surface. In MFC2, the calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) ions in form of calcium phosphate salt were detected on membrane surface. The presence of Ca, magnesium (Mg), and P ions precipitated on membrane surface was reduced by applying the highest flow recirculation in both MFCs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398624121042; http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20165; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85020169264&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1944398624121042; https://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.20165; https://www.deswater.com/home.php
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know