Development of collaborative writing: challenges of its implementation through digital tools
Praxis Educativa, ISSN: 1809-4309, Vol: 19, Issue: 2024, Page: 1-18
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The implementation of writing through digital tools is an important challenge for the teaching-learning process. Under this premise, the general objective of the research was to analyze the collaborative production of essays, through Google Docs. 32 teachers in training of pedagogy in basic education participated, selected through intentional non-probabilistic sampling. Developed under a mixed approach, the study had a descriptive scope. The data collection was carried out through three procedures: observation and recording of interactions, analysis of virtual feedback and analysis of responses to an online questionnaire. Among the main findings are difficulties to organize time efficiently, impediments to agree on points of view, obstacles to making decisions in remote environments and limitations for the selection of information, for the choice of arguments incorporated in the essay and for the group reflections.
Bibliographic Details
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know