Comparing the efficiency of N-doped TiO and commercial TiO as photo catalysts for amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin photo-degradation under solar irradiation
Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, ISSN: 1532-4117, Vol: 57, Issue: 9, Page: 813-829
2022
- 10Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have gained traction as alternative solutions for eliminating pollutants from pharmaceutical wastewater for reuse. In this research, the performance of two photo-catalysts (Commercial TiO and synthesis N-doped TiO) were compared in terms of the degradation of amoxicillin and ciprofloxacin from an aqueous solution using a photo-catalytic batch system under solar irradiation. The influence of five operating factors is: pH (5–11), HO concentrations (200–600) mg/L, catalyst concentrations (25–100 mg/L), Antibiotic concentration (25–100) mg/L and reaction time (30–120 min), on the oxidation of the listed above pollutants were investigated using the central composite design (CCD) of response surface methodology (RSM). The catalyst of N-doping TiO was synthesized by sol-gel method, using the urea (CHNO) as a nitrogen source. The resulting material was analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), X-Ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Additionally, it can be observed from the analysis of the characteristics of N-doped TiO the homogenous dispersion of nitrogen molecules, small particle sizes, and energy-gap reduction, prompting a 6% increase in antibiotic degradation compared with Com. TiO. In the RSM analysis, the ideal conditions were found to be a pH of 5, HO conc. of 400 mg/L, catalyst conc. of 50 mg, and antibiotics conc. of 25 mg/L for an antibiotics reduction rate of 89.31% (AMOX/Com. TiO/Solar), 90.2 (CFX/Com. TiO/Solar), 95.8% (AMOX/N-TiO/Solar) and 97.3% (CFX/N-TiO/Solar). Experimental results were in good agreement with predictions because the predicted R matched well with the adjusted R.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138305142&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2022.2117960; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36073063; https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10934529.2022.2117960; https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2022.2117960
Informa UK Limited
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know