Democracy: Consensus or conflict?
Analisis Politico, ISSN: 0121-4705, Vol: 33, Issue: 98, Page: 226-240
2020
- 131Usage
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Democracy implies necessarily conflict. The Colombian conflict is a case of a differend, [différend] a dispute, a conflict between positions in which any consensus betrays the original claims of, at least, one of the parties. The inequality and distortion that the rebellion exposes cannot be resolved by an agreement between the opposed parties. A secularized version of the sacrament of “forgiveness and reconciliation” is now presented as a political virtue. However, the projection of the differend in consensus and reconciliation will always be deceptive and deceitful. The political space of democracy must resist a narrative of reconciliation. The text discusses, in the contemporary Colombian context, the concepts of “ a “democracy”, reconciliation” and differend, criticizes the unity of notions such as “people” and “nation, and problematizes the supposed dichotomy between “war” and “peace”.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85090535935&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v33n98.89419; https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/anpol/article/view/89419; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-47052020000100226&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-47052020000100226&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-47052020000100226; http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0121-47052020000100226; https://dx.doi.org/10.15446/anpol.v33n98.89419
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know