Automatic detection of cone photoreceptors in split detector adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images
Biomedical Optics Express, ISSN: 2156-7085, Vol: 7, Issue: 5, Page: 2036-2050
2016
- 56Citations
- 52Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations56
- Citation Indexes56
- 56
- CrossRef49
- Captures52
- Readers52
- 52
Article Description
Quantitative analysis of the cone photoreceptor mosaic in the living retina is potentially useful for early diagnosis and prognosis of many ocular diseases. Non-confocal split detector based adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) imaging reveals the cone photoreceptor inner segment mosaics often not visualized on confocal AOSLO imaging. Despite recent advances in automated cone segmentation algorithms for confocal AOSLO imagery, quantitative analysis of split detector AOSLO images is currently a time-consuming manual process. In this paper, we present the fully automatic adaptive filtering and local detection (AFLD) method for detecting cones in split detector AOSLO images. We validated our algorithm on 80 images from 10 subjects, showing an overall mean Dice’s coefficient of 0.95 (standard deviation 0.03), when comparing our AFLD algorithm to an expert grader. This is comparable to the inter-observer Dice’s coefficient of 0.94 (standard deviation 0.04). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first validated, fully-automated segmentation method which has been applied to split detector AOSLO images.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84964799649&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/boe.7.002036; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27231641; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-7-5-2036; https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-7-5-2036; https://www.osapublishing.org/viewmedia.cfm?URI=boe-7-5-2036&seq=0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/boe.7.002036; https://opg.optica.org/boe/abstract.cfm?uri=boe-7-5-2036; https://www.osapublishing.org/boe/fulltext.cfm?uri=boe-7-5-2036&id=340279; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=boe-7-5-2036; https://opg.optica.org/viewmedia.cfm?uri=boe-7-5-2036&seq=0&html=true; https://opg.optica.org/viewmedia.cfm?uri=boe-7-5-2036&seq=0; https://www.osapublishing.org/boe/abstract.cfm?uri=boe-7-5-2036
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know