Erratum: Non-invasive assessment of human cone photoreceptor function (Biomed. Opt. Express (2017), 8, 5098, 10.1364/BOE.8.005098)
Biomedical Optics Express, ISSN: 2156-7085, Vol: 9, Issue: 4, Page: 1842-null
2018
- 1Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Correction Description
We present an erratum to correct an inadvertent error in our paper: “Non-invasive assessment of human cone photoreceptor function” [Biomed. Opt. Express 8, 5098 (2017)] In section 2.5 of our recently published manuscript [1], we erroneously stated: "The pooled variance of all control trials was subtracted from the pooled variance of all stimulated trials. The square root of the result was taken as the measured intrinsic reflectance response, which we denote as σ R (t)," while a correct description of how the response obtained was provided in the caption of Fig. 4. The text in Section 2.5 should read: "The pooled standard deviation of all control trials was subtracted from the pooled standard deviation of all stimulated trials. The difference was taken as the measured intrinsic reflectance response, which we denote as σ(t)".
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044955843&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/boe.9.001842; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29676401; https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?URI=boe-9-4-1842; https://dx.doi.org/10.1364/boe.9.001842; https://opg.optica.org/boe/fulltext.cfm?uri=boe-9-4-1842&id=383939
Optica Publishing Group
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know